Did Mas Oyama ever fight? THE TRUTH

3:07:00 PM Tkd kwan 0 Comments

There is speculation around whether Mas Oyama ever engaged in physical fights, with some sources suggesting he may not have. The MMA UnderGround is exploring the truth behind martial arts stories such as this, including the question of whether Oyama actually chopped off bull horns or if that was just a myth. Oyama is renowned as a significant figure in martial arts history for introducing a level of realism to the practice. However, there are also accounts of him being involved in pro wrestling and possibly embellishing stories for publicity in a time when the nation craved muscular heroes. Despite the legendary tales surrounding him, Oyama's achievements include being credited as the first to complete the 100 Man Kumite, defending himself against an armed attacker, and winning the karate section of the first post-WWII Japanese National Martial Arts tournament in 1947.
It appears that there are conflicting accounts and opinions regarding Mas Oyama's fighting experience and skill. While some sources like Jon Bluming suggest that Oyama never sparred or competed, others uphold his reputation as a formidable martial artist known for his Kyokushin Karate style. The footage from a 1967 meeting with Taekwondo founder Choi Hong Hi may indicate a different fighting approach than what is typically associated with Oyama, leading to questions about his sparring experience. It's worth noting the potential biases and personal conflicts that may have influenced perspectives on Oyama's abilities, such as the disagreement between Oyama and Bluming over leadership in Kyokushin in Holland. Ultimately, the truth about Oyama's fighting skills may be difficult to determine definitively given these conflicting accounts.
The account provided by Michael DeMarco presents a contrasting view of Mas Oyama compared to the widely depicted image of him as a fierce and skilled martial artist. DeMarco suggests that the stories about Oyama's fighting history, including his alleged 270 American bouts and the world championships in the 1970s, may have been exaggerated or manipulated.
DeMarco points out that karate competitions during Oyama's time had strict rules and conditions that may not have permitted the kind of intense fighting that Oyama was claimed to have engaged in. He also notes that Oyama's breaking demonstrations, a central aspect of his public image, may have been achieved through deceptive means such as specially prepared tiles, bricks, and bottles. This revelation challenges the authenticity and integrity of Oyama's martial arts demonstrations.
Despite these revelations, DeMarco acknowledges Oyama as a great teacher who trained many skilled fighters and popularized karate through his books. He highlights Oyama's influence on his own life and the positive impact Oyama had on him as a mentor and teacher.

Overall, DeMarco's account sheds light on the potential embellishments or deceptive practices associated with Mas Oyama's public persona and martial arts demonstrations, offering a more critical perspective on his legacy in the martial arts world.
The excerpt reveals the author's complex and nuanced perspective on Mas Oyama, the founder of Kyokushinkai karate. The author, who opened his own budo club and had a personal relationship with Oyama, appreciates the positive impact Oyama had on his life and martial arts journey. He acknowledges Oyama's skills as a teacher and the positive influence he had on many practitioners.

However, the author also highlights certain controversial aspects of Oyama's life and the martial arts world, suggesting that Oyama's self-proclaimed title of "the Godhand" was not universally accepted and that Oyama had connections to politicians and businessmen that earned him the nickname "Mr. Ten Percent." The author also touches upon the presence of politics and possible connections to the yakuza within the Kyokushinkai organization.
Despite these critical observations, the author expresses deep sadness and admiration for Oyama upon his passing, emphasizing the love and respect he still holds for his former teacher. He reflects on the complexities of human relationships and the flaws that can exist even in revered figures like Oyama.

Ultimately, the author's portrayal of Mas Oyama serves as a reminder that martial arts instructors, no matter how skilled or revered, are human beings with their own strengths and weaknesses. This nuanced perspective encourages a deeper understanding and critical examination of martial arts figures and the organizations they lead, moving beyond blind reverence to a more balanced and thoughtful appreciation of their contributions.